Let’s dive deeper into the Storytelling post from Sunday, for there’s a lot of good stuff to explore that goes way beyond the stories we find on the printed page, stage, screen, or even those shared around the campfire. We can take the concept and begin to examine the ever-present stories and narrators that surround us every day, including the most important – the ones in our head.
Simply put, many of the things around us that we take for granted open up and take on whole new meanings when we look at the framework that surround them rather than the thing itself.
This is especially potent to dovetail it with the conversation about systems and on the notion of the path(s) of least resistance. These systems, be they writ large or the very personal, are mostly never derived in a vacuum; instead they come about, evolve, and are kept in place by notions and narrations. So too is the same that keeps them in place, reliably producing the same outcome over and over again, even and especially when that outcome is, to one degree or another, deleterious.
This is also a great concept to fortify against false dichotomies. “It can only be this or this” is not only missing the vast possibilities of both our capacity but also the variations of the universe, but it is also weaponizing a tightly woven narrative that forcibly limits the conditions as to make a binary outcome inevitable.
I’ve long been fond of noting, “We talk about the economy like it’s gravity.” That is, we talk about it like it is a, or maybe the, fundamental physical force in the universe over which we have no choice but to do its bidding. Except, when look through a telescope at the cosmos, or when we look through a microscope at the micros, we find no evidence of “the economy” shaping things. It is the narrative that creates the container we’re in and that turns it into “This is the way it goes; this is the way it has to go.”
As ever, little is truly inherent. Contexts, however, can make it seem like so. By bringing mindfulness, inquisitiveness, and a little literary wonder we can read beyond the lines to see the author’s hand at work, freeing us to see things more broadly and more clearly. Whether in determining who we know ourselves to be as an individual, or who we know ourselves to be as a society, or as a species, the constraints melt away and we’re open, ready to write our more perfect future.*
* Which, of course, in turn we can, at a later time, revisit and see the additional “author’s hands” that were perhaps invisible to us at the time, letting us once again go beyond to write an even more perfect future… and on, and on, and so on.
One thought on “Philosophy Tuesday”